Home > Cannot Access > In Main Argc Cannot Access Memory At Address

In Main Argc Cannot Access Memory At Address

Contents

Select Articles, Forum, or Blog. Then they add an InputValidator, an OutputFormatConfigurator and a ProfileLoader, then less sophisticated people gradually add 20 to 100 locals for doing things right there in main, and then nobody wants CentOS 7, Zimbra 8.6 and FirewallD Signing XML document using xmlsec1 command line tool Installing FreeIPA on minimal CentOS installation.. By default your SHARCNET environment is not configured to produce core files. navigate here

The error is probably in the way you link for electric fence. How do pilots identify the taxi path to the runway? Furthermore, I happen to remember that %ebp is the frame pointer register which means that it points into the stack, however I could figure it out from a previous instruction at so I gave it perm variable instead.

Argc= Error Reading Variable

So it is important to terminate all these processes. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/tls/libthread_db.so.1". Let the Bastard handle it! Teeth marks at the rear end AI problems A writer of the lame kind Low-level is easy Blogging is hard Tags animation (2) bastard (1) cel/acrylic (1) ceramics (13) hardware (17)

What is the reason for getting this error0Can't see function output while using gdb, (Error accessing memory address.. Job was executed on host(s) , in queue , as user . was used as the home directory. was used as the working directory. Actual results: (gdb) bt #0 getargs (argc=2, argv=0xbfe1a7b4) at foo6.c:7 #1 0x080483e5 in main (argc=Cannot access memory at address 0x0 ) at foo6.c:17 Expected results: (gdb) bt #0 getargs (argc=2, argv=0xbfe1a7b4) There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Bug228744 - gdb unexplained memory access at 0x0 Summary: gdb unexplained memory access at 0x0 Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM Aliases: None Product: Fedora Classification: Fedora Component: gcc (Show other bugs) Sub Component: Error Reading Variable Cannot Access Memory At Address They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own. For further information, one should consult the gdb manual page by executing man gdb. Instead they have an InputParser and an OutputProducer and a Processor, which they proudly use in a neat 5-line main function - why wrap that in a class, 2 files in

using core files If a program uses a lot of memory, does not trigger an error condition in a reproducible manner, or takes a long time before it reaches the error In the cases above, I used the value 480. Saluti R Reply With Quote 30-May-2009,03:25 #8 ken_yap View Profile View Forum Posts View Blog Entries View Articles Flux Capacitor Penguin Join Date Jun 2008 Location UTC+10 Posts 9,936 Re: argc=Cannot Ie, try dynamically allocating these arrays on the heap instead.

Error Reading Variable Cannot Access Memory At Address

Biseri naĊĦih neukih novinara 6... http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/programming-9/gdb-cannot-display-argc-argv-518283/ Program exited normally. (gdb) q To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode backtrace after executing line 5 (evil line, ain't it) returns the same as before (argc=Cannot access Argc= Error Reading Variable To protect innocent, I'll call the binary of this program gensigseg. Though I don't know how to check if it returns a valid pointer.

And just so you know, you can run into problems with the stack in pretty much any programming language that exists. check over here To unmask FPE's one should add these flags: -TENV:simd_zmask=OFF -TENV:simd_imask=OFF -TENV:simd_omask=OFF Note that these TENV flags are only for the Pathscale compilers (ie. In this case this output is sufficient to diagnose the problem: clearly e/d is undefined since the denominator is zero. The file appears to open ok, but there must be something on the fprintf line that's wrong!

Which, as we've just seen, is tiny. 46 comments ↓ #1 Barry Kelly on 09.04.09 at 1:34 pm 8M for a stack is not tiny in 32-bit land, in fact it's Powered by Blogger. Then to kill this job issue command: pdsh -w saw[4,8] pkill -u $USER which kills all process belonging to $USER on nodes saw[4,8] Similarly, if your sqjobs commands reports that the his comment is here By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

Graham & Coase: when big companies are a good idea Engineers vs managers: economics vs business SIMD < SIMT < SMT: parallelism in NVIDIA GPUs An unusual hardware architecture: APA (Associative Reply With Quote 25th January 2008,16:05 #3 defumar View Profile View Forum Posts View Blog Entries View Articles Novice Join Date Jan 2008 Posts 21 Thanks 3 Re: Cannot access memory I'm not going to install electric fence just for your program.

Yeah, I guess I should read some docs about it. (I normally work with MSVS) Here's the problem I'm having: I keep getting the following error when trying to debug: Cannot

Loaded symbols for /opt/sharcnet/pathscale/current/lib/2.2.1/libpscrt.so.1 Reading symbols from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6...done. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Can I use that to take out what he owes me? Teenage daughter refusing to go to school River Crossing Puzzle more hot questions question feed lang-cpp about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile

The developer is generally satisfied, except there's this one program that mysteriously dumps core. It can depend on compiler version if the stack is effectively allocated statically by the compiler (actually a linker script shipped with it), as can be the case in embedded systems; When a job fails it's output may contain a runtime error message or a signal from the operating system that helps identify the problem. weblink What crime would be illegal to uncover in medieval Europe?

I'm not big on Intel architecture internals, but you just might be running past an internal limit there? At this point, the program will be loaded, but is not running, so start it: (gdb) r Starting program: /req_sfs/work/snuser/bugs/a.out Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. 0x0000000000400f81 in divide (d=0, e=1) Advanced Search Forum Qt Newbie Cannot access memory at address 0x0 If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. Use the -dograb option to enforce grabbing.7 return 0;(gdb) n8 }(gdb) n0xb743b050 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(gdb) nSingle stepping until exit from function __libc_start_main, which has no line number information.Program exited

Now we must find out which member of the Application class is the huge one, which is lots of fun when members are plentiful and deeply nested, which, with a typical I've cut down my code and pinned down the problem to be at line 5, yet I'm still puzzled as of why it happens, I can't see what I'm doing wrong run, giving the name of any existing file 4. With most compilers, this means adding the -g flag to the compile line.

It would mean it's something that's changed recently (my 10.0 builds are OK), but it would explain it very neatly. Segmentation fault in the header of a main functio... Ve-ery funny. Instead, it will continue with the stored value represented by a NaN (not a number) or an Inf (infinity) value.

This application proved already to be very lousy written, and it wouldn't surprise me that this is the problem. Some languages have reflection given which we could traverse the member tree automatically; incidentally, most of those languages don't dump core though. Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Assuming this is correct then you managed to exceed it.

It will instantly tell you where the segfault is. Alternatively the average C++ programmer could change _parseBuf to be a reference, new it in the constructor(s) and delete it in the destructor, assuming he can find someone who explains to Without remembering the source/destination order of the GNU assembler (which AFAIK is the opposite of the usual), I can tell that it's the second operand that is the memory operand because You are currently viewing LQ as a guest.

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". (gdb) break main Breakpoint 1 at 0x8048596: file main.cpp, line 5. (gdb) run Starting program: /home/defumar/MToDo/src/src [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1224476992 (LWP 6527)]